Model comparison / LiveBench snapshot

Ox Alpha vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Compare the public ox-alpha-max and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 open leaderboard records, then decide which route deserves a test in your own coding or agentic workflow.

Snapshot: LiveBench-2026-06-25Reviewed: 24 August 2026CTA: Tokenra
01 / Quick answer

DeepSeek leads this public snapshot; test the route before deciding.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 open is listed at 77.4 Overall on LiveBench-2026-06-25, compared with 69.2 for the ox-alpha-max label. DeepSeek also scores higher in the listed reasoning, coding, agentic coding, mathematics, data analysis, language, and instruction-following categories. That is a useful shortlist signal, not a universal ranking of every API route or application.

Decision rule: choose DeepSeek as the first benchmark hypothesis if the published snapshot is your main criterion. Choose Ox Alpha when you specifically need to evaluate the Tokenra route and its behavior on your own representative workload.
02 / Scope and names

One product, several public identifiers; two benchmark records.

On this site, ox-alpha-max, stealth/ox-alpha, and ox-alpha refer to the same Ox Alpha product under different public naming contexts. The LiveBench row is named ox-alpha-max; the Tokenra API reference uses stealth/ox-alpha.

The product naming is normalized for readability, while the evidence remains scoped: the leaderboard shows a label and a release snapshot. It does not publish every provider, request setting, model revision, or raw artifact needed to call the row a reproduced Tokenra API run.

Comparison scope and access boundary
DimensionOx AlphaDeepSeek
Leaderboard labelox-alpha-maxDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 open
Documented API contextTokenra Chat Completions routeVerify current DeepSeek API documentation
Benchmark identityPublic label-level observationPublic label-level observation
Commercial priceCheck Tokenra live termsCheck DeepSeek live pricing
03 / LiveBench data

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher across the displayed categories.

The following values are transcribed from the LiveBench public leaderboard, release LiveBench-2026-06-25, reviewed 24 August 2026.

LiveBench-2026-06-25 leaderboard values
MetricOx Alpha / ox-alpha-maxDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 open
Overall69.277.4
Reasoning76.685.8
Coding75.877.2
Agentic Coding52.654.9
Mathematics77.595.1
Data Analysis75.879.2
Language66.182.1
Instruction Following60.367.7
Cost per successful task$0.000$0.044

Important: “Cost per successful task” is LiveBench’s benchmark field. It is not an input/output token price, provider invoice, subscription price, or free-access promise. See the benchmark methodology for the evidence standard.

04 / Interpretation

A leaderboard difference narrows a test; it does not replace one.

The largest displayed gap is in mathematics, while the coding scores are closer. That pattern can help prioritize experiments, but it does not tell you how either model will handle your repository, tool schemas, private terminology, output format, timeout policy, or review process.

For a fair application test, keep the prompt set, context selection, token budget, tools, retries, and scoring rubric fixed. Record provider route, date, model identifier, latency, failures, and actual billing separately from the LiveBench table.

05 / Use cases

When should you choose each model?

Practical starting points
If you prioritizeStart withWhy
Published benchmark scoreDeepSeek V4 ProIt has the higher Overall and category values in this snapshot.
Testing the documented Ox Alpha routeOx AlphaThe Tokenra API reference provides the integration boundary to validate.
Production coding reliabilityRun bothYour own repository, prompts, tools, and failure policy determine the result.
Commercial costVerify both providersLiveBench cost/success is not API pricing.

To start an actual Tokenra integration, use the Ox Alpha API reference and keep credentials server-side.

06 / FAQ

Ox Alpha vs DeepSeek V4 Pro questions.

Is Ox Alpha better than DeepSeek V4 Pro?

On the LiveBench-2026-06-25 snapshot, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the higher Overall score. The result is a leaderboard comparison, not a universal claim about every workflow or provider route.

Which model scores higher on LiveBench?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 open is listed at 77.4 Overall, while ox-alpha-max is listed at 69.2 in the same LiveBench snapshot.

Is Ox Alpha free?

The $0.000 value displayed by LiveBench is a benchmark cost-per-successful-task field. It is not a Tokenra API price or a universal free-access guarantee.

Does the ox-alpha-max score verify the Tokenra Ox Alpha route?

No. The public leaderboard identifies the ox-alpha-max label and its snapshot values, but it does not independently publish a complete mapping to the Tokenra stealth/ox-alpha route.

Test the route you will actually use.

Read the Tokenra integration boundary before comparing production behavior.

Get API access